Today they're showing the semi-finals of the Australian Open in a few minutes so I don't have much time to write til later. (Before I was a semi-professional dog agility competitor, I was a semi-professional tennis player!)
I picked Prisoners of Conscience as my first episode because of its themes: Conscience, Responsibility, Morality, Good and Evil, and Honor. (If I had footnotes, I'd put this in one: There's also clearly the theme of fathers and sons, but I won't comment on that because I don't quite understand the obsession men have with their fathers.) The backdrop of this episode is the policy of the American intelligence community, and thus its overall foreign policy.
The Chilean poet Antonio, who has become very close friends with the American professor (English? Film studies?) Waldo Jerrell, is kidnapped off the street in front of Waldo. Of course Waldo turns to McCall to help find Antonio. When a picture of Antonio with a black ribbon tied around it is found in his otherwise empty apartment, McCall recognizes the calling card of Randall Payne, the man who killed McCall's father thirty years before and whom McCall tracked for 20 years until the Company told him that Payne was dead. He meets with Control to ask how Payne could still be alive, and finds out that the Company had been using Payne's organization, known as CNI (a Blackwater-like group? unclear), for the last 10 years and that he is now involved in Chile.
For several seasons, we have heard about McCall's past actions in Chile. In "Prelude" (first episode of the second season) it comes to light that McCall helped organize and execute a coup which resulted in the fall of the elected government and put a brutal dictator into power. This is an allusion to the CIA's involvement in the overthrow of the Allende government in Chile and its backing for many years of the dictator Pinochet. In "Prelude", an American journalist is tortured in an attempt on the part of the Astice (sp?) (=Pinochet) government to find who might be undermining its rule. Control says in that episode that the dictator is trying to stabilize the country before human rights can be taken care of; if you've lived in the US long enough, you've heard this argument many times by government officials. Ironically, this is the same argument made by Control in "Prisoners of Conscience" to justify the Company's using Payne's organization, but it is two years later. Nothing has changed.
It is evident that the US government is condoning the actions of Payne. So who is Payne? (It's kind of silly that his name is Payne, since what he inflicts is pain, but we'll leave that one alone.) It seems to me that he is a representative of Evil, although there is certainly no consensus on the show whether Evil as a malevolent force exists, or if it is evil, the bad that men do. More on this soon.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There's also clearly the theme of fathers and sons, but I won't comment on that because I don't quite understand the obsession men have with their fathers.)
ReplyDeleteI think you could have a field day with this theme, if you tried coming up with a post or several. As you said, there's Waldo and surrogate son Antonio; there's Robert McCall and his dead father, then there's surrogate father Robert and surrogate son Mickey Kostmayer, and there's Robert McCall and his son, Scott.
Is Mickey the son McCall deserved and Scott is the son McCall got? I thought it was very interesting that Scott and Robert had lots of problems, yet Scott completely trusted Mickey ("Mission: McCall") and never thought once that Mickey would, or could, harm him. I also liked that Mickey, the original 'whacko to stick his finger in the fan' was the one to rein in Scott a few times.
Oops, the above was me, forgot to put my name afterwards.
ReplyDeleteAnna
Wow, what a cool idea, that Mickey is the son McCall deserved and Scott is the son McCall got. I wonder... On the other hand, Mickey knows who McCall is, probably as much as anyone, whereas Scott never got a chance to know him. And Mickey is older than Scott. Maybe in the future?
ReplyDeleteStill I don't understand the whole father/son dynamic. I mean, after 30 years McCall is still obsessed with his father? Yikes.
Well, McCall's father did die when Robert was a young man (nineteen years old, didn't they say, in 1952 when his father was murdered?), and it wasn't an easy death. McCall also had unresolved issues about his mother, who died while Robert was at boarding school and wasn't allowed to see her, and the family had disowned Robert's father, for marrying beneath him (not only an American, but an entertainer).
ReplyDeleteBoth deaths must have had an effect on his psyche, and seeing that McCall's father seemed to have a fairly rotten relationship with his son, I'm not surprisd that Robert had a lousy relationship with Scott. The sins of the father passed on to the son (in this case, unable to sustain a good relationship with a loved one).
Anna
Yes, it does make sense. The show did a good job using fathers and sons a a recurring theme, didn't it?
ReplyDeleteI know it happens. It just isn't something that I personally can figure out. I suppose because I never had a problem with my mother or my father that I have carried with me for 30 years. But then I never had any children, either, just the furry kind, who do love you no matter what.